Search results
10 results ordered by
Supreme Court upholds that fiduciaries must act with "single-minded loyalty toward their principals (or beneficiaries)"
In Rukhadze and others v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another [2025] UKSC 10, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the legal test for the account of profits rule (the Profit Rule).
Read moreAcceptable levels of consumer harm – the FCA seek guidance in balancing risk with reward
The chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Nikhil Rathi, has called for the UK government to define an 'acceptable level of consumer harm' in response to the government's demand for reduced regulations.
Read moreAn update to the FCA's "polluter pays" framework – accountability for harm caused to consumers.
The Financial Conduct Authority (the FCA) has issued updated guidance on its "polluter pays" framework. In an update published on 14 January 2025, the FCA provided further information on the framework, which could lead to firms compensating consumers when they provide poor advice, products or services.
Read moreA matter of interpretation – the Supreme Court look at contractual interpretation once more
In their recent Judgment in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd (a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands) v Blacks Outdoor Retails Ltd [2023] UKSC 2 the Supreme Court adopted a commercially balanced interpretation of a lease; rejecting the overly textual approach of the Court of Appeal in favour of reading the relevant clause in the context of the lease as a whole.
Read moreOmbudsman decision – clarifying liability where there are delays in the pension administration process
When delays occur in pension transfers, the implications for members can be significant—but how far does a provider’s responsibility extend? A recent determination by the Pensions Ombudsman in the case of Mr R offers important clarification. Whilst the Ombudsman recognised some administrative shortcomings, the decision reaffirmed that providers are not liable for all financial consequences arising from delays, particularly when those consequences result from a member’s own actions.
Read moreTribunal refuses HMRC's application for specific disclosure from taxpayer
In Coopervision Lens Care Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 00351 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) refused HMRC's application for specific disclosure finding that the order sought by HMRC was unclear, disproportionate and inappropriate in the circumstances.
Read moreTax Tribunal upholds taxpayer's appeal in respect of remote gaming duty
In allowing the taxpayer's appeal, the First-tier Tribunal determined that cashback payments constituted prizes won for the purposes of section 157 of the Finance Act 2014 and Remote Gaming Duty.
Read moreUpper Tribunal upholds penalty imposed for failing to take 'corrective action' in response to a follower notice
Upper Tribunal dismisses taxpayer’s appeal against a penalty issued under the follower notice regime for failing to take corrective action, as the final judicial ruling specified in the follower notice was relevant to the arrangements the taxpayer had implemented.
Read moreTribunal allows appeals against discovery assessments
In Charles Collier and CB Collier Partnership v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00993 (TC), the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the assessed loss of tax was not brought about deliberately by the taxpayers and had occurred due to carelessness. The 6-year time limit therefore applied to HMRC making assessments and amendments and, under that time limit, HMRC were out of time. The taxpayers' appeals were allowed.
Read moreAccountants obliged to report suspected misuse of the Bounce Back Loan Scheme
The Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) was introduced to enable smaller businesses adversely affected by the coronavirus pandemic to access government-backed finance.
Read moreStay connected and subscribe to our latest insights and views
Subscribe Here