Search results
89 results ordered by
Lawyers Covered - October 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - September 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers' Risks in Acting for Corporate Clients Without Authority
The recent decision in Rushbrooke UK Ltd v 4 Designs Concept Ltd [2022] EWHC 1687 (Ch) has highlighted the dangers for lawyers in acting for corporate clients on the instructions of a director without authority of the company. Most of the authority in this area has focused on commencement of litigation but the principles apply too to transactional matters.
Read moreLawyers Covered - August 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - July 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreIs the FCA to blame for BSPS? MPs seem to think so
The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) yesterday published a report entitled "Investigation into the British Steel Pension Scheme". The report makes a number of recommendations in light of its investigations in to the FCA's conduct and regulatory oversight at the time of the issues arising from the British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) and in particular the decision by 7,834 members to transfer to a personal pension arrangement. The report is heavily critical of the FCA's handling of BSPS and its regulatory oversight of the defined benefit transfer market generally. Given the request in the report for an update from the FCA on its progress on the various recommendations and conclusions in 6 months' time, we wait to see how the FCA reacts to yet further criticism of its handling of BSPS at a time when it is reviewing responses to the consumer redress scheme consultation.
Read moreLawyers Covered - June 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - May 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - March 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreDuties of Care to Third Parties in Tax Avoidance Schemes – Disappointment for Investors in McClean as Zacaroli, J Rejects Claims
Mr Justice Zacaroli has now handed down his judgment in David McClean and others v Andrew Thornhill QC [2022] EWHC 457 (Ch) - a ~£40m claim by investors in a tax scheme against one of the leading tax barristers in the country. The judge dismissed the claim in its entirety holding, amongst other things that the barrister did not owe a duty of care to the investors.
Read moreDuties of Care to Third Parties in Tax Avoidance Schemes – Disappointment for Investors in McClean as Zacaroli, J Rejects Claims
Mr Justice Zacaroli has now handed down his judgment in David McClean and others v Andrew Thornhill QC [2022] EWHC 457 (Ch) - a ~£40m claim by investors in a tax scheme against one of the leading tax barristers in the country. The judge dismissed the claim in its entirety holding, amongst other things that the barrister did not owe a duty of care to the investors.
Read moreLawyers Covered - February 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreSIPPs and FOS - does the Rowanmoor decision change anything?
Last week FOS published a decision it reached last year in a complaint against a SIPP provider involving advised sales. The FOS upheld the complaint, finding that the SIPP provider should have rejected business from the regulated financial adviser, CIB Life and Pensions Limited (CIB), given, broadly, red flags available to the SIPP provider with respect to the operation of CIB's business model including that CIB was not advising on the ultimate investment within the SIPP and as a result such introductions involved a significant risk of consumer detriment. The decision has received quite a bit of press attention - but has it moved the dial for SIPP complaints before FOS or not?
Read moreLawyers Covered - January 2022
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreThe Future of Insolvency Regulation
On 21 December 2021 the Government launched a consultation into the future of insolvency regulation. The changes proposed in the consultation document will have a wide ranging impact on the insolvency profession (and its insurers) with the proposals including: the direct regulation of insolvency firms, the introduction of a single regulatory body with powers to order compensation against insolvency practitioners and firms, a new additional requirements regime, changes to the bond regime and a public register of insolvency practitioners and firms. Many of the changes proposed require primary legislation and so it may be some time before the changes to take effect (if adopted). But there does appear to be some wind behind these proposals given they follow on from the Call for Evidence in 2019 and a more general focus on insolvency issues in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Read moreLawyers Covered - December 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - November 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - October 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - July 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - August 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - May 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreLawyers Covered - April 2021
Welcome to the latest edition of our Lawyers Liability & Regulatory Update, in which we look back over the last month at key developments affecting lawyers and the professional risks they face.
Read moreTribunal refuses HMRC's application for specific disclosure from taxpayer
In Coopervision Lens Care Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 00351 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) refused HMRC's application for specific disclosure finding that the order sought by HMRC was unclear, disproportionate and inappropriate in the circumstances.
Read moreTax Tribunal upholds taxpayer's appeal in respect of remote gaming duty
In allowing the taxpayer's appeal, the First-tier Tribunal determined that cashback payments constituted prizes won for the purposes of section 157 of the Finance Act 2014 and Remote Gaming Duty.
Read moreUpper Tribunal upholds penalty imposed for failing to take 'corrective action' in response to a follower notice
Upper Tribunal dismisses taxpayer’s appeal against a penalty issued under the follower notice regime for failing to take corrective action, as the final judicial ruling specified in the follower notice was relevant to the arrangements the taxpayer had implemented.
Read moreTribunal allows appeals against discovery assessments
In Charles Collier and CB Collier Partnership v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00993 (TC), the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) found that the assessed loss of tax was not brought about deliberately by the taxpayers and had occurred due to carelessness. The 6-year time limit therefore applied to HMRC making assessments and amendments and, under that time limit, HMRC were out of time. The taxpayers' appeals were allowed.
Read moreTaxpayer's appeal succeeds as HMRC failed to open enquiry in time
In Monks v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 853 (TC) the First-tier Tribunal concluded that HMRC had not opened a valid enquiry because the taxpayer didn't receive HMRC's letter until after the relevant time limit had expired.
Read moreSupreme Court provides clarity on Transfer of Assets Abroad legislation
In allowing the taxpayers' appeal, the Supreme Court determined that shareholders were not "transferors" for the purposes of the Transfer of Assets Abroad regime in the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988.
Read moreHome run! - Tribunal finds that taxpayer who bought and sold three properties in quick succession was not trading
Taxpayer purchasing, renovating and selling properties allowed private residence relief on capital gain and held not to be trading as property developer for tax purposes.
Read moreA look into HMRC's toolbox during a criminal investigation
HMRC has far-reaching powers it can deploy during a criminal investigation into suspected tax fraud, which include applying for and executing search warrants (colloquially referred to as a "dawn raid"), making arrests and the compulsorily obtaining information and documentation through production orders and disclosure notices/orders. A criminal investigation conducted by HMRC is one of the most stressful events a business can experience and failing to properly respond can have serious repercussions, including significant financial and reputational damage or even prison time for individuals.
Read moreTribunal allows taxpayers' appeals against discovery assessments as company could not distribute goodwill it did not own
Tribunal allows taxpayers' appeals against HMRC discovery assessments as company could not distribute goodwill it did not own.
Read moreTribunal varies Schedule 36 information notice as it sought material not reasonably required by HMRC
In Parker Hannifin (GB) Ltd v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00971 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal found that an information notice issued by HMRC, under Schedule 36, Finance Act 2008, was not invalid because it required electronic searches using a list of specified search terms but it did seek information that was legally privileged or not "reasonably required" and the notice was varied accordingly.
Read moreUpper Tribunal remits CGT appeal back to Tribunal for rehearing
In M Campbell v HMRC [2023] UKUT 265 (TCC) the Upper Tribunal (Tax chamber) remitted the taxpayers' appeals back to the First-tier Tribunal to consider the liability to capital gains tax, after the taxpayer flipped four residential properties.
Read moreTribunal allows taxpayers' appeals against discovery assessments
In Smith v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 00912 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayers' appeals against discovery assessments, finding that a transfer of goodwill did not amount to a distribution under section 1000, Corporation Tax Act 2010 (CTA), because the goodwill was owned personally by the taxpayers.
Read moreAIM higher!
In Graham Chisnall and Others v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 857 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) held, in allowing the taxpayers' appeals, that evidence derived from the sale price of shares on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) was more reliable than evidence provided by a valuer employed by HMRC.
Read moreTax Tribunal allows taxpayer's appeal against discovery assessment
FTT allows taxpayer's appeal against HMRC discovery assessment seeking to charge CGT on the disposal of a property between separating spouses.
Read moreCourt of Appeal considers 'main purpose' test and finds in favour of taxpayer
Read moreDirectors not liable under PLNs as HMRC failed to establish deliberate conduct by company
In Sharon Suttle and another v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 873 (TC), the Tax Tribunal allowed the taxpayers' appeals against Personal Liability Notices (PLNs) on the basis that the company did not make a deliberate inaccuracy in its returns.
Read moreAccountants obliged to report suspected misuse of the Bounce Back Loan Scheme
The Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS) was introduced to enable smaller businesses adversely affected by the coronavirus pandemic to access government-backed finance.
Read moreStay connected and subscribe to our latest insights and views
Subscribe Here