Search results
1517 results ordered by
Supreme Court considers the application of SAAMCo to claims against lawyers
The test for remoteness of damage in claims against lawyers is going to be examined today and tomorrow by the Supreme Court. The justices hearing the appeal include the president Lord Neuberger together with Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge.
Read moreThe proof of the pudding is in the eating
Insureds can have their cake but only if they eat it too
Read moreA new and better approach to claims against financial advisers?
A Judge has found in favour of Coutts in a claim for negligent investment advice for just under £3.3m plus interest. The Judge’s findings are of interest given that he refused to assess whether the investments recommended were suitable for the Claimants according to a body of accepted professional opinion (the so called “Bolam Test”). Instead, the Judge focused on whether the risks of the investments were properly explained to the Claimants, whether they could afford to take such risks and showed themselves willing to do so.
Read moreChanging experts - a risky business
The recent case of Allen Tod Architecture Ltd (In Liquidation) v Capita Property and Infrastructure Ltd (previously known as Capita Symons) provides a timely reminder of the risks of changing experts. In this case, the Defendant made an application for specific disclosure of documents prepared by the Claimant’s first expert. The High Court held that privilege in such documents should be waived and the documents should be disclosed where a party seeks to rely upon the evidence of an alternative expert.
Read moreLife sciences, August 2016
Here is our latest life sciences update. Read on for practical tips on the Insurance Act 2015, the implications of the NHS wading into the debate over diagnostic apps, how Brexit may affect medical regulations and impending litigation over fertility treatment. Some of these topics will be addressed in more detail in our next life sciences seminar on 20 September 2016. To register your interest, please email seminars@rpclegal.com.
Read moreOffer rejected by counter-offer - a cautionary tale
Non-Part 36 offer not capable of acceptance once rejected by a Part 36 counter offer
Read moreProduct Liability Update August 2016
In this Update we take a look at some of the recent stories making the news, from electrical fires to mislabelled fishcakes.
Read moreRead with "interest" - Part 36 offers
In many cases it will be easy to determine whether a claimant has beaten their Part 36 offer and accordingly whether they are entitled to the additional benefits provided for under CPR 36.17(4). Sometimes, however, because of the interest accruing on damages between the date of the Part 36 offer and the judgment date, the judgment sum only exceeds the Part 36 offer by a small amount. If this happens, what are the consequences?
Read moreWinning the battle but losing the war
We have previously commented on the need for claimants to establish all elements of a claim (duty, breach, causation and loss) if they want to achieve more than a Pyrrhic victory. The case of Mortgage Express v Countrywide Surveyors Limited provides another example of this, but with a slightly different twist.
Read moreTiuta International Ltd (in liquidation) v De Villiers Surveyors
The Court of Appeal recently overturned a first instance decision in an application for summary judgment in the matter of Tiuta International Ltd (in liquidation) v De Villiers Surveyors Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 661
Read moreCosts - issue at your peril
A recent decision re-emphasises the costs risks a claimant faces if it issues proceedings but does not serve them.
Read moreInsurers liable to pay damages to insureds for late claims payment
For insurance policies entered into after 4 May 2017, insurers could be liable to policyholders for late payment of claims. It will be an automatically implied term of the policy that sums due from insurers must be paid within a reasonable time.
Read moreAccountants’ update
Welcome to RPC’s 2016 accountants’ bulletin. The aim of the bulletin is to review a number of key developments from 2015, and to give an insight on some of the current “hot topics” in this area.
Read moreMultiple adjudications - how many adjudicators?
Obtain consent or use different adjudicators
Read moreGroup litigation in medical and life sciences
Dorothy Flower talks about the impact of the "nocebo" effect on group litigation in the UK.
Read moreSupreme Court hurts employers on vicarious liability
Cox v Ministry of Justice (2016) and AM Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc (2016)
Read moreClarifying block notification feels ripples
Judgment in this case was handed down at the beginning of February 2016.
Read moreThe Insurance Act – what are the five biggest changes to the current law?
James Wickes – a partner in our Insurance Group – tells us why it's very much in vogue to be an insurance lawyer these days.
Read moreHealth and safety law update
HSE to prosecute Merlin Attractions Operation Ltd over Alton Towers “Smiler” incident
Read moreTake priority but be reasonable
On 20 January 2016, Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart handed down his judgment on preliminary issues in Commercial Management (Investments) Limited v (1) Mitchell Design and Construct Limited, and (2) Regorco Limited1
Read moreAdjudication - RMP Construction Services Ltd v Chalcroft Ltd
On 21 December 2015, Stuart-Smith J handed down his decision in RMP Construction Services Ltd v Chalcroft Ltd1 , an action for summary judgment in the Technology and Construction Court to enforce an Adjudicator’s decision.
Read moreDo receivers owe duties to bankrupt mortgagors?
The Court of Appeal has recently considered whether an LPA Receiver owes a duty of care to a bankrupt mortgagor in connection with the way the Receiver deals with the mortgaged property. In a decision which will be welcomed by Receivers and their insurers, the court decided that a Receiver owes no such duties.
Read moreUK flooding: the aftermath
As the flood waters subside and residents, businesses, insurers and public bodies survey the damage and pick up the pieces, thoughts will turn to what, if anything, could have been done differently to have prevented or minimised the damage caused.
Read moreLove thy neighbour but don't give them any advice!
The first TCC judgment of the year, Burgess & Burgess vs Lejonvarn [2016] EWHC 40 (TCC), is of particular interest to both architects and their insurers, as it discusses and distinguishes between a contractual relationship and one that gives rise to an assumption of responsibility in tort.
Read moreAnnual Insurance Review 2015
There are no prizes for guessing the likely main insurance law event of 2016. The Insurance Act 2015 will come into force on 12 August 2016.
Read moreCyber fraud - a new hope?
We have previously warned of the threat posed by fraudsters who are targeting solicitors’ client accounts to misappropriate funds (read our blog last February here).
Read moreNew sentencing guideline for health and safety offences
In November 2014, the Sentencing Council began consulting on a draft guideline for health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter, and breach of food safety and hygiene regulations.
Read moreIs time up for claims against valuers?
Assessing the point at which a cause of action accrues in a claim against a valuer is a difficult task, not least because of the lack of judicial guidance on the issue.
Read moreGeneral liability update
Defending a claim for breach of Occupiers’ duty – A bridge too far?
Read moreInsurance Act 2015
Amendment to include Law Commission’s proposals on damages for late payment of claims
Read moreVW emissions rigging scandal- Insurance exposure
Insurance exposures
Read moreTianjin explosions leave insurers exposed to claims
On 12 August 2015, multiple explosions occurred in the Chinese city of Tianjin, a major industrial port and goods gateway to Beijing.
Read morePlay nicely, children
Litigation is, by its very nature, an adversarial process. But as the court has made clear in the case of Simon Gotch & Susan Linda Gotch v Enelco Limited , litigants should also co-operate, to ensure the swift and cost-effective resolution of their disputes.
Read moreMilton Furniture and Brit- clarifying attendance
Milton Furniture Limited v Brit Insurance
Read moreGetting to Level 2
What insurers should look out for in BIM project management
Read moreFlood Re and the impact on surveyors and valuers
The catastrophic impact that flooding can have on property owners has been seen all over the news for the past decade. In particular, 2012 saw some of the wettest weather for a century and left thousands of households struggling to find insurance cover for their properties.
Read moreBeyond night and day: Importance of causation
In order to succeed in a claim for professional negligence, a claimant must establish that the professional owed him a relevant duty of care, that they breached that duty and that the breach caused the loss he seeks to recover.
Read moreFinancial Services: Minimising Risk in a Dawn of Opportunity
Over the last few years, firms have been asking themselves how they will make money in the post RDR world.
Read moreR&D claim upheld by Tax Tribunal
In Collins Construction Ltd v HMRC [2024] TC09332, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) upheld the company's claim for R&D tax relief rejecting HMRC's claims that the expenditure was "subsidised" or tied to "contracted out" activities.
Read moreContentious Tax Review
A recap of important tax decisions from 2024, with a particular focus on interesting procedural and jurisdictional issues that the tax tribunals and courts considered, including decisions on anonymity in tax appeals, cross-examination in judicial review, and the consequences of failing to comply with tribunal directions.
Read moreTribunal allows taxpayers' appeals as they were carrying on a business with a view to profit
In GCH Corporation Ltd and others v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 922 (TC), the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) allowed the taxpayers' appeals and concluded that GCH Active LLP was carrying on a "business" with a view to profit at the time loan notes were transferred to it and the requirements of section 59A, Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA), were therefore satisfied and the transfers were capital contributions rather than disposals and no chargeable gain arose.
Read moreTax Bites – February 2025
Welcome to the latest edition of RPC's Tax Bites – providing monthly bite-sized updates from the tax world.
Read moreTaxing Matters: Nature's wealth: unlocking the power of natural capital with Daisy Darrell
In the latest episode of Taxing Matters, our host, Alexis Armitage is joined by Daisy Darrell, a Senior Associate in Birkett's Agricultural and Estates team to discuss all things natural capital.
Read moreV@ update - January 2025
Welcome to the January 2025 edition of RPC's V@, our monthly update which provides news and analysis from the VAT world.
Read moreHMRC’s enquiry and correction powers
A key consultation on proposed reforms to HMRC’s enquiry and correction powers closed today. Dubbed the "Tax Administration Framework Review – New Ways to Tackle Compliance", this consultation is the latest in a series aimed at streamlining the UK’s tax system. The goal? To make it easier for taxpayers while enabling HMRC to allocate resources more effectively.
Read moreStay connected and subscribe to our latest insights and views
Subscribe Here